Repeal of SF e-cigarette ban, once backed by Juul, is overwhelmingly rejected by voters – San Francisco Chronicle

San Francisco’s upcoming ban on the sale of e-cigarettes will remain in space, as voters soundly rejected a pollmeasure Tuesday that can possess overturned the prohibition licensed by the Board of Supervisors in June.

Proposition C became as soon as shedding by 4-1. The measure would possess allowed the sale of vaping devices and nicotine cartridges with some new restrictions. It will possess restricted the series of vaping merchandise a particular person would possibly perhaps lift to two devices and five packs of cartridges per transaction in brick-and-mortar stores, and two devices and 60 milliliters of nicotine liquid every month online.

The measure additionally would possess required online sellers to observe for a enable, an similar to what brick-and-mortar stores must cease.

The regulations would possess taken the distance of the outright gross sales ban on e-cigarettes that supervisors licensed to strive in opposition to the upward thrust in teen vaping. The laws, slated to arrangement shut attain in January, suspends the sale of e-cigarettes which possess no longer handed a Food and Drug Administration review — which comprises all e-cigarettes now available on the market. Nonetheless the ban would possibly perhaps no longer be permanent; it’d be lifted for any e-cigarettes that in the end dash FDA review.

Prop. C — dubbed “An Act to Prevent Formative years Use of Vapor Products” — became as soon as this election’s extensive-tag item from the originate up. It became as soon as backed by the San Francisco vaping firm Juul, in an are trying to stave off the ordinance that would possibly perhaps limit the firm from promoting its merchandise in its dangle fatherland.

Juul spent nearly $19 million to promote Prop. C thru the Coalition for Realistic Vaping Law — a marketing campaign committee — earlier than without warning withdrawing its financial toughen in gradual September amid scrutiny from regulators and lawmakers serious of the firm’s marketing systems to formative years.

A most up-to-date spate of vaping-linked lung ailments and deaths, despite being linked mostly to illicit THC merchandise, additionally dealt a blow to public perception of vaping.

Prop. C drew a backlash from public nicely being teams, fogeys and native and nationwide officials. The No on C marketing campaign’s biggest financial backer became as soon as billionaire and outdated Unique York Metropolis Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who build in $7.1 million to defeat the measure as section of his $160 million marketing campaign to lower formative years vaping nationwide.

Metropolis Criminal legit Dennis Herrera, who co-authored the e-cigarette ban laws with Supervisor Shamann Walton, applauded the measure’s dying.

“San Francisco voters are too dapper to be fooled by Juul,” Herrera said in a assertion. “Juul is Wide Tobacco, and it’s using a conventional ploy from the Wide Tobacco playbook to set up out and hook but every other generation of formative years on nicotine. Voters seen merely thru Juul’s deception.”

Juul declined to comment on the election outcomes, referring to a assertion that firm CEO K.C. Crosthwaite made in September, when the firm launched it became as soon as withdrawing its toughen for Prop. C as section of a firm-extensive review of policies.

“This determination would now not switch the reality that as a San Francisco-based and headquartered firm we remain committed to the metropolis,” Crosthwaite said.