Scientists cast doubt on NASA group’s parallel universe theory – New York Post

Now not so quick, Earthlings.

Folks bear been captivated by facts about a conceivable parallel universe — but there’s a substantial sunless hole within the theorem expounded by a crew of NASA scientists, per a train on CNET.

Consultants working on an experiment in Antarctica broken-down a pleasant helium balloon to defend NASA’s Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna, or ANITA, which they talked about detected particles that defy the rules of physics.

An array of radio antennas hooked as much as the balloon flew over the frigid continent at an altitude of about 121,000 ft — nearly four times as high as a industrial flight — and detected high-vitality particles, is named neutrinos, which constantly bombard our planet.

Low-vitality, subatomic neutrinos can pass fully thru Earth, but higher-vitality objects are stopped by solid topic, which formulation that the high-vitality particles can very finest be detected coming “down” from enviornment.

However the team’s ANITA detected heavier particles, so-called tau neutrinos, which near “up” out of the Earth, implying that these particles are genuinely touring backward in time, suggesting evidence of a parallel universe.

Some estimates indicate that 100 trillion neutrinos whiz thru your body every 2d, per CNET, which talked about ANITA has detected a chain of “anomalous” events that admittedly can’t be defined by the rules of physics.

“The peculiar ANITA events bear been known and talked about since 2016,” Ron Ekers, an honorary fellow at CSIRO, Australia’s nationwide science agency, suggested the outlet.

“After four years there has been no sufficient explanation of the anomalous events viewed by ANITA so here is amazingly frustrating, particularly to these interested,” he added.

The reports referring to the NASA experiment had been culled from a fresh paywalled article within the New scientist titled, “We will bear noticed a parallel universe going backwards in time.”

One other neutrino observatory on the South Pole, is named IceCube, has been following up on the ANITA experiment and likewise suggests the unique rules of physics can’t trace the peculiar phenomenon.

“In this kind of notify you open exploring a long way more vulgar possibilities,” Ekers talked about.

But there are a quantity of competing theories that can trace issues, in conjunction with that the Antarctic ice could almost definitely almost definitely almost definitely itself be giving upward push to the strange events, per the outlet.

Pat Scott, an astroparticle phenomenologist on the University of Queensland, talked about that whereas the theorem “is plausible,” there are myriad other theories that can myth for ANITA’s detections.

“There’s nothing that necessarily makes it a detection of a parallel universe,” Scott suggested CNET.

Clancy James, a radio astronomer at Curtin University in Australia, eminent that there’s serene noteworthy that astrophysicists and scientists don’t know about neutrinos.

“We’re fully certain that there’s new physics accessible to be stumbled on,” James talked about.

Geraint Lewis, an astrophysicist on the University of Sydney, also sought to dampen the eagerness a pair of parallel realm where time runs backward and every part is in reverse.

“There are a group of doable candidate particles that would myth for the outcomes from ANITA,” Lewis suggested CNET.

“Whereas parallel universes sound thrilling and attractive when discussing the ANITA signal, replacement suggestions are serene on the table,” he talked about, adding that it doesn’t imply the theorem is contaminated, correct that the burden of evidence is now in opposition to it.

For now, Ekers talked about, we bear “a considerably cheeky explanation … born out of the frustration of getting nothing else that labored.”

He added that here is “supreme out-of-the-box thinking” and a “inviting” concept — but not one which wants to be taken too seriously.